The U.S. threatened to take further action against the South Sudan government if it does not end violence and allow United Nation ( UN ) peacekeepers to do their job.
A month after U.S. Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley visited
South Sudan and met with President Salva Kiir in the capital Juba, she told the
Security Council: “Words are no longer sufficient.”
“The U.S. is prepared to pursue additional measures against
the government – or any party, for that matter – if they do not act to end the
violence and ease the suffering in South Sudan,” said Haley, who was the most
senior member of President Donald Trump’s administration to visit South Sudan. The
Trump administration imposed sanctions in September on two senior South
Sudanese officials and the former army chief for their role in the civil war
and attacks against civilians.
However, any U.S.
push for the UN Security Council to take further action against South Sudan is
likely to be resisted by veto power Russia.
The council sanctioned several senior South Sudanese officials on both
sides of the conflict in 2015, but a U.S. bid to impose an arms embargo in
December 2016 failed. “It is counterproductive to impose targeted sanctions,
counterproductive to impose an arms embargo, such measures will not help to
break this deadlock and will only further exacerbate the crisis,” Russia’s
Deputy UN Ambassador Petr Iliichev.
South Sudan
spiraled into civil war in late 2013, two years after gaining independence from
Sudan, and a third of the 12 million population has fled their homes. The
conflict was sparked by a feud between Kiir, a Dinka, and his former deputy
Riek Machar, a Nuer, who is being held in South Africa. A fragile peace deal in
South Sudan broke down last year and East African bloc IGAD has been trying to
revive it.
No comments:
Post a Comment